Newsweek sparks riots, retracts story
Newsweek on Sunday retracted (see here, here, and here) , or kind of retracted, a story about interrogation practices at Guantanamo bay that had sparked violent clashes in several Muslim countries, notably Pakistan and Afghanistan. At least 16 people were reported killed in the unrest. Newsweek now says the original source was no longer “confident” he actually saw reported in a Pentagon document what he told the magazine’s reporters — that a Holy Quran had been flushed down the toilet to soften up the detainees.
Oops, sorry, next time we’ll try to confirm what our sources tell us. Really sorry ’bout that.
Scary thing is, though, that the initial report — even if false — sounded entirely credible. And of course there will be those who will tell you that Newsweek was forced by the U.S. government to retract, or is owned by Jews, or is a big nasty U.S. corporation that had no choice but to retract. [Update, as of early afternoon: this has already happened on a mailing list I’m on. Ah, if only I were as good at predicting the stockmarket!] But even these nutcases (which seem to make up around 85 percent of the world’s population) shouldn’t detract from the fact that it’s scandalous such a report would ring credible — which it did! And for that, the administration has nobody to blame but itself.




No More Mister Nice Blog has a nice read on the Newsweek bruhaha.
jwb
Comment by Jimbo — May 18, 2005 @ 3:01 pm
Here’s the deal, it probably all happened. What really pisses me off is that on all the right wing ‘talk’ shows they go on and on about how the prisoners were supplied copies of the Koran by the governement of the U.S.
The Red Cross has halfway verified the Newsweek story, SINCE the retraction of the story!
The REAL Newsweek story that should be getting people all pissed off had to do with what got the U.S. into this war in the first place.
Comment by Katja — May 23, 2005 @ 4:21 am